ACE genotype may have an effect on single versus multiple set preferences in strength training

Colakoglu M. , CAM F., KAYITKEN B., Çetinöz F., COLAKOGLU S., Türkmen M., ...Daha Fazla

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY, cilt.95, ss.20-26, 2005 (SCI İndekslerine Giren Dergi) identifier identifier identifier

  • Cilt numarası: 95 Konu: 1
  • Basım Tarihi: 2005
  • Doi Numarası: 10.1007/s00421-005-1335-2
  • Sayfa Sayıları: ss.20-26


A polymorphic variant of the human angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) gene was identified. The 'D' (rather than `I') variant was associated with improvements in strength related to physical training. We set out to determine whether the response to different patterns of strength training night also differ. Ninty-nine Caucasian male non-elite athletes were randomly allocated into one of three groups: 31 nontraining/control (CG: 31), single-set (SSG: 35) and multiple-set (MSG: 33). SSG and MSG trained three times a week for 6 weeks. Both training groups were underwent a strength-training program with two mesocycles (12-15 repetition maximum (RM) and 8-12 RM mesocycles). One RM loads in half squat and bench press were assessed before training and after the first and second mesocycles. ACE polymorphisms analysed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) methods. Subjects with ACE II genotype in the MST group had improved strength development in 12-15 RM, while SST and MST groups had similar gains in 8-12 RM. Subjects with ACE DD genotype in both the SSG and the MSG had similar benefits from both 12-15 RM and 8-12 RM. Strength gains for subjects with ACE ID genotype in the SSG were similar to MSG gains in response to 8-12 RM loads but not with 12-15 RM loads. Additionally, subjects with DD genotype had superior strength gains in both strength training groups. Tailoring strength training programmes (single-set vs. multiple set) according to the athlete's ACE genotype may be advantageous.